Richard Dawkins is one of the most influential — and polarizing — science writers of the past fifty years. To understand why his name still provokes debate, it helps to remember that before him, evolutionary biology was mostly a technical discipline; after him, it became a cultural argument about meaning itself. Dawkins
In 1883, British polymath Francis Galton coined a new science. He called it eugenics — from the Greek eu-genēs, meaning “well-born.” Galton, a cousin of Charles Darwin, believed that if natural selection shaped species, society could improve itself by guiding human breeding. His ambition was statistical: to apply the tools of
When Charles Darwin published On the Origin of Species in 1859, he never used the phrase “survival of the fittest.” That slogan came seven years later from philosopher Herbert Spencer, who read Darwin’s work and imposed an industrial metaphor on it. Spencer’s phrase became the moral shorthand of
In the early twenty-first century, Helen Keller became one of the strangest victims of internet irony. Across TikTok, Reddit, and YouTube, teenagers joked that she “wasn’t real,” or that her achievements were fabricated by handlers. Videos with the tag #HelenKellerWasFake have gathered over 25 million views. To historians, the
Stanford University was founded in 1885 by railroad magnate Leland Stanford and his wife, Jane Stanford, as a “university of the future.” Its charter promised “instruction of both sexes, in the arts and sciences, and the rights and duties of citizenship.” It was built not in Boston or New York
In 1440, an Italian humanist with a gift for grammar overturned one of the most powerful political lies in European history. Lorenzo Valla (1407–1457), a priest and philologist from Rome, demonstrated that the Donation of Constantine—the document granting the pope temporal authority over the Western Roman Empire—was
Modern culture worships intelligence but struggles to define it. From the I.Q. test to the Nobel Prize, every generation has tried to measure genius as if it were a commodity — something that can be scored, ranked, and rewarded. Yet each attempt to quantify brilliance tells us more about the
When Ray Dalio self-published Principles: Life & Work in 2017, he offered a blueprint for decision-making that promised to merge philosophy, management science, and software. In his telling, success could be achieved through “radical transparency” — a total system of recorded meetings, algorithmic feedback, and public evaluation. To its admirers, Bridgewater
In 1759, when Adam Smith published The Theory of Moral Sentiments, the English language lacked a word for empathy. The closest term was sympathy — from the Greek sym-pathos, meaning “to suffer with.” The modern word empathy would not appear until the German philosopher Theodor Lipps coined Einfühlung (“feeling into”) in
In 1752, a Scottish philosopher and an American printer found themselves debating a paradox that still defines the modern world: can reason alone sustain a society, or must emotion guide the invisible hand? Adam Smith and Benjamin Franklin never formally co-authored a treatise, yet their correspondence and overlapping circles in
Long before Silicon Valley, there was Rome. And after Rome fell, there was the Church — the first true information monopoly in Western history. When Latin stopped being the language of daily life, it didn’t die. It ossified — becoming the proprietary code of a new empire of minds. The Catholic
In July 1890, President Benjamin Harrison signed the Sherman Antitrust Act, the first federal law designed to restrain monopolies. Named for Senator John Sherman of Ohio, it promised to restore competition in an age dominated by railroads, oil trusts, and industrial combines. Yet, in practice, it didn’t. The law’